If with wine you are drunk, be happy,
If seated with a moon-faced beauty, be happy,
Since the end purpose of the universe is nothingness;
Hence picture your nothingness, then while you are, be happy!
It is a thousand years since the great Persian philosopher Omar Khayyam wrote those words (or something along those lines), so why are they still taboo in mainstream Islamic society? Sure there are plenty of individual Muslims who profess their faith in public and drink and fornicate in private but they are outnumbered and out shouted by the zealots, and the radicals and the hardliners. When Salman Rushdie published his rather mild criticism of Islam in 1989 there were popular riots from Bangalore to Bradford. Why has free thought and public criticism disappeared from mainstream Islam over the last millennium? Where is today’s Omar Khayyam? Is he shackled in an Iranian prison? Or was he butchered in the street like Theo Van Gough?
After witnessing the uprising of the Sudanese Wahhabists in 1898, Winston Churchill wrote a withering critique of Islam, declaring that “No stronger retrograde force exists in the world at this time”. He was wrong about many things but he was right about appeasement and I concur with his views on Islam and, perhaps, by extension all organised religion. I’ll reconsider my views if I hear the following sentiments freely discussed in Tehran, Riyadh and Kabul.
O Mullah, We do much more work than you,
Even when we are drunk, we are still more sober than you,
You drink people's blood and we drink the grape's blood,
Let's be fair, which one of us is more immoral?
P.S. I'm sure it rhymes better in classical Persian.